Search NCSBN
The search results displayed are from the entire site. Visit the Resources Section to focus your search and filter only resource items (publications, videos, papers, toolkits and other resources).
-
Microsoft Word - Final Clinical Instruction in Prelicensure Nursing Program…
L. & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high- fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27, 10-28. Issenberg, S.B., McGaghie, W.C., Gordon, D. L., Symes, S., Petrusa, E. R., Hart, I. R., Harden, R. M. (2002). Effectiveness of a cardiology review course for internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14, 223-228. Jeffries, P. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing.
-
ROI.pdf
Limited Control Group (in 2013 USD) Limited Control group d = a x b $11,011 $26,499 TTP Group e = a x c $6,368 $15,326 Turnover savings for one nurse NGRN with TTP f = d - e $4,643 $11,173 Cost of TTP Ongoing cost of TTP Program g $3,185 $3,185 Net cost of TTP Program with ongoing costs ($ savings) h = f - g $1,458 $7,988 Development Cost of TTP Program i $723 $723 Development and Ongoing Costs of TTP Program j = i + g $3,908 $3,908 Net Cost of TTP Program with Development and Ongoing Costs ($ savings) k = f - j $735 $7,265 NGRN = new graduate registered nurse, TTP = transition to practice NURSING ECONOMIC$/May-June 2017/Vol. 35/No. 3118 only a few new nurses can expect a cost savings when implementing and maintaining a TTP program.
-
Policy_Position_Statement.pdf
Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 7(1), 4-6. Kramer, M., & Hafner, L. P. (1989). Shared values: Impact on staff nurse job satisfaction and perceived productivity. Nursing Research, 38(3), 172-177. Kramer, M., & Schmalenberg, C. (1988). Magnet hospitals: Part I institutions of excellence. JONA, 18(1), 13-24. Phillips, C. Y., Palmer, C. V., Zimmerman, B. J., & Mayfield, M. (2002). Professional development: Assuring growth of RN-to- BSN students. Journal of Nursing Education, 41(6), 282-284. Tourangeau, A. E., Doran, D.
-
2024nlc-legal-forum-ulrs.pdf
Meets the home state’s qualifications for licensure or renewal of licensure, as well as, all other applicable state laws; Key Points and Considerations: • The applicant must meet your single state license requirements. • If they can’t meet your SSL requirements, they can’t meet the MSL ULRs. Article III (c): 2. i. Has graduated or is eligible to graduate from a licensing board- approved RN or LPN/VN prelicensure education program; or Key Points and Considerations: • This ULR pertains to board-approved programs in the US. • Note that an applicant may have graduated or be eligible to graduate.
-
PowerPoint Presentation
Daivd Joyce (R-OH), Susanne Bonamici (D-OR), Jennifer Kiggans (R-VA) and Lauren Underwood (D-IL) • Statutory authorization expired September 30, 2025 • Unanimous approval in House Subcommittee • Nursing Community Coalition continues to push action in House full committee and Senate Other Endorsed Bills • I CAN (Improving Care and Access to Nurses) Act (S. 575/H.R.1317) - Removes several federal barriers to APRN practice under Medicare • Sponsors: Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Rep. Daivd Joyce (R-OH) • Nurse Faculty Shortage Reduction Act (S. 3707/H.R.7279) – Pilot program to supplement faculty pay • Sponsors: Sen.
-
2025-rexpn_bmcclendon.pdf
The REx-PN Practice Analysis and Test Plan Brittany McClendon, MBA, MSN, RN NCSBN Content Development Associate I, Examinations Objectives • Understand the relationship between the REx-PN Practice Analysis and REx-PN Test Plan • Discuss the REx-PN Test Plan categories REx-PN Examination Purpose • Fair, comprehensive • Entry-level • Current practice Fair and Comprehensive • REx-PN Test Plan is developed from data collected from the Practice Analysis • Each exam encompasses all 8 client needs categories of the Test Plan • Panels help eliminate item bias and culturally insensitive language Entry-level Current Practice • Practice analysis • Ongoing item review • Input of nurse experts from British Columbia and Ontario REx-PN Item Development Process What is a Practice Analysis?
-
2022IT_Montgomery-Russell.pdf
• No: suspicious courses • Google the school, contact the school to verify administrator and student, check Nursys for license in another state CASE C Paper or Electronic Document APPEARANCE • Is the document altered or forged? • Possibly: looks forged or altered Document CONTENT Discrepancy • Does the document/transcript make sense? • Yes, makes sense • Email/call school • Verify signature • Verify student graduated I have not sent an affidavit of graduation for Patricia ______. Also t ...
-
PowerPoint Presentation
Naccarato • Submitted application for licensed practical nurse in Louisiana in 2006 • Application denied Lack of good moral character o Volatile temper o Addressed others with gender-based and racially charged statements o Threatened staff Engaging in fraud and deceit • 2006 application for license denied in Mississippi • 2008 application for license denied in Indiana Holden v. Naccarato • Subsequently applied for licensure in New York • BON denied citing failure to meet moral character requir ...
-
Microsoft Word - MINUTES_NLC_Commission_Meeting_ March 10 2025_DRAFT 6
Site: nursecompact.com
When a licensee gets into trouble during the term of an ATD agreement, their misdemeanor may get upgraded to a felony. States individually determine which misdemeanors are related to the practice of nursing. If a licensee self‐discloses that they have entered an ATD program, 8 BONs should insert in their agreements “I agreed to surrender my multistate license until I meet all terms and conditions.” F. Knight stated there are three types of Social Security numbers ‐ the compact does not reference what a state can or cannot accept. The three types are Unrestricted, Valid for Work Only, and Not Valid for Employment. 11.
-
NCSBN_AnnualReport2014.pdf
Anderson, Kansas Diane D. Blier, Rhode Island Bonnie Cone, Texas Sheila Davis, Vermont Mariclaire E. England, Minnesota Sara A. Griffith, North Carolina Georgina R. Howard, New York Jennifer Lewis, North Carolina Nancy McCarthy, Louisiana-PN Gene i. Pingle, Washington Rebecca Reese, Idaho Brenda B. Rowe, Georgia Felicia Stokes, District of Columbia Rhigel (Jay) Alforque Tan, Nevada Julie Traynor, North Dakota Jennifer Winston, Ohio NCSBN STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMiTTEE Nathan Goldman, Kentucky, Chair Karla Bitz, North Dakota Peter Dennehy, Ireland Amy Fitzhugh, North Carolina Ruby Jason, Oregon Barbara H.