Search NCSBN

The search results displayed are from the entire site. Visit the Resources Section to focus your search and filter only resource items (publications, videos, papers, toolkits and other resources).

  • 2024dcm_achoflet.pdf

    Journal of Nursing Regulation,11(2),28–35. • Trinkoff, A. (2022, January 1). The Prevalence of Substance Use and Substance Use Problems in Registered Nurses: Estimates From the Nurse Worklife and Wellness Study. Journal of Nursing Regulation. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.journalofnursingregulation.com/article/S2155-8256(22)00014-X/fulltext#relatedArticles

  • REx-PN-Webinar-April2021.pdf

    Item Writing Practice Steps in Item Writing 1. Select a nursing concept. • Activity statement from Test Plan • Nursing Process • Body System • Disease Process Steps in Item Writing 2. Locate references in textbooks, journals, and/or approved-websites. 3. Write the stem. 4. Write the key. 5. Write the distractors. 6. Review the item. Developing an Item Stem • A complete item stem should include: 1. Scenario 2. Client condition and descriptors 3. Information requested (question) 4. Additional directions (if needed) • A stem can be either open-ended or closed Stem Examples The nurse is caring for a client who has (client condition).

  • Resources | NCSBN

    The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) produces publications, online courses and videos that contribute to the body of nursing knowledge. Individuals nominated for this award shall have made sustained and significant contributions through the highest commitment and dedication to the mission and vision of NCSBN. 2019   | Video 2019 Award Recipient – Fred Knight Meritorious Service Award Fred Knight, JD, Board Staff, General Counsel, Arkansas Board of Nursing The Meritorious Service Award is granted to a member for significant contributions to the mission and vision of NCSBN. 2019   | Video 2019 Award Recipient – Ingeborg “Bibi” Sch ...

  • Resources | NCSBN

    The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) produces publications, online courses and videos that contribute to the body of nursing knowledge. Five regulatory guidelines are explained, and a timeline for BONs meeting these recommendations is described. Citation: Lower, B. & Spector, N. (2014). Regulatory implications and recommendations for distance education in prelicensure nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(3), 24-33.. 2014   | Papers The Tri-Regulator Collaborative Position Statement on Interprofessional, Team-based Patient Care Tri-Regulator Collaborative express its support for interprofessional collaborat ...

  • Microsoft Word - Final_08_reg model.doc

    Similarly reports of nurses in these programs have been positive, though there is no formal data on these outcomes. One national study (5) showed high annual turnover of PNs and RNs in long-term care (50 percent), though this was for all nurses in long-term care, and not just new nurses. A national survey on the nursing home workforce (18) calculated priority ratings on areas for needed improvement: 1) lower job stress; 2) management that listens; 3) management that cares; 4) training to deal with difficult residents; and 5) training to deal with difficult family members.

  • Transcript_2024aprn_cgill.pdf

    When the asked individuals if they would recommend a longitudinal assessment to a CRNA collie, 95% of them said yes, so we were pleased with that finding. When we looked at the perceptions and attitudes, in summary, we found overall participants related to migrated usability of the platform highly, that's why talk about the 4.3 out of 5 stars. They also found ©2024 National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. All rights reserved. 7 participants preferred a more continuous L.A. format in the future, according to the survey results. And although these findings were not statistically significant, there were some differences in perceptions and attitudes when we compared the ratings.

  • transcript_2021_MYM_pdickison_ngn.pdf

    You either get everything right or you get everything wrong. And that's worked well for us based on having multiple-choice items with four responses or multiple-response items with up to maybe six. The problem with that is if you start looking at what we were calling matrix items and you take a 3 by 5 matrix, there's a potential of 15 responses in that, and choosing to get all are right or all wrong has some problems with it both in terms of psychometric fairness and legal defensibility. So what we've looked at is doing something where we call polytomous scoring, which means there are more possible categories.

  • Transcript_2026dcm_fmeyers.pdf

    It identified the provider, Dr. Samuel Harding. It identified the facilities. There was accompanying medical records. I had mentioned the synthetic medical records that go with it. It had identified from the records that there were 52 identified conditions, 103 medications, 5 documents, and 2 X-rays. And then it categorize it as a quality of care case related to prescribing and polypharmacy, essentially going around. The allegation, the core allegation, delayed recognition during a myocardial infarction, polypharmacy without adequate interaction monitoring, and reactive rather than proactive cardiac care.

  • 2026_RExPN_Infoflyer_FRC.pdf

    Site: rexpn.com

    Recevoir un courriel de Pearson accusant réception de votre inscription à l’examen REx-PN. 4. Le BCCNM/CNO vous rend admissible à passer le test dans votre profil Pearson. § Vous devez être déclaré admissible par le BCCNM/CNO dans les 365 jours suivant votre inscription au REx-PN et le paiement des frais. 5. Recevoir un courriel d’autorisation pour l’examen (AutE) de Pearson. § Vous devez vous présenter au test dans les dates de validité sur l'AutE. Il n'y a pas de prolongations. 6. Prenez rendez-vous pour votre examen en ligne ou en appelant le service aux candidats de Pearson au 866 496-2539.

  • transcript_2024scisymp_kfoli.pdf

    These 11 strategies forwarded by the AANA to prevent diversion. And I've outlined in the ovals the four items that had the largest perceived effectiveness. And so the first column, were they implemented in their facility? And you can see on a scale of 1 to 5 that there were some that were quite low in terms of their mean. The second one, labeled effective, is did they perceive these, if they were implemented, to be effective? In other words, if you did do these things, would you think they were effective?