Search NCSBN

The search results displayed are from the entire site. Visit the Resources Section to focus your search and filter only resource items (publications, videos, papers, toolkits and other resources).

  • 1995-2002 | TIMELINE

    Site: timeline.ncsbn.org

    The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) is a not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to provide an organization through which boards of nursing act and counsel together on matters of common interest and concern affecting the public health, safety and welfare, including the development of licensing examinations in nursing. Uniform APRN Licensure/Authority to Practice Requirements The revisions to the Alternative Mechanism Element of the Uniform APRN Licensure/Authority to Practice Requirements were adopted: “For applicants for whom there is no appropriate certifying exam available, states may develop alternative mechanisms to assure initial competence until Jan.1, 2005. Evidence of an equivalent mechanism to certification examinations will not be accepted after Jan. 1, 2005, and initial licenses as an APRN will no longer be issued without an approved certification examination.” APRN Compact Adopted the NLC for APRNs, which addressed the need to promote consistent access to quality advanced practice nursing care within states and across state lines.

  • CRE_Grant_Timeline.pdf

    For any questions please contact: cre@ncsbn.org   CRE Grant Timeline   All CRE grant proposals will follow this process with minimal changes.  For any questions  regarding the grant process, please contact cre@ncsbn.org   Grant Proposal  1. Applicants are encouraged to take advantage of pre‐application consulting to help focus their proposals and gain insight into NCSBN’s current research priorities. 2. Applicants are also encouraged to review recent articles in the Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR) – a number of JNR articles are authored by CRE grantees. 3.

  • Self-Inventory_Checklist.pdf

    1 Self-Inventory: Leadership Competencies Instructions: Read the behaviors listed under each leadership competency and reflect on whether you consistently demonstrate the indicated behaviors. LEADING YOURSELF COMPETENCY YES NO Adaptability Think “outside the box” and adjust to changes easily Understand the impact of your decision on other people Able to effectively negotiate a new approach when appropriate Integrity Articulates values Follows through on promises Decisions and actions ar ...

  • NLC-DL-Comparison.pdf

    Site: nursecompact.com

    Two Compacts Compared Driver’s License Compact vs. the Nurse Compact 1. Issued in your primary state of residence. 2. When driving in other states, you must know and obey that state’s laws (rules of the road). 3. While driving in other states, if you violate the state’s law, the state can remove your driving privileges in that state. 4.

  • 2019MYM_KThomas.pdf

    Policy Recommendation #2: The APRN Compact should supersede ancillary supervision provisions. • Provisions differ in: • Role • Setting • Area of practice • Geographic location • Example • Minnesota: “(b) A registered nurse anesthetist may perform nonsurgical therapies for acute and chronic pain symptoms upon referral and in collaboration with a physician licensed under chapter 147.

  • 2019MYM_JBush.pdf

    • Name change; • Re-branded; • Created new patient centered resources; @WAMedCommission WMC.wa.gov Survey Results: How did you learn about the Medical Commission? Friends/Family 11% Internet Search 9% News Article 40% Other 36% Referred by a health care professional 4% @WAMedCommission WMC.wa.gov What Did We Do With This Information? We Hired a Public Information Officer: 1. Publicize the Patient Safety Aspect of our work. 2. Create a Proactive Media Strategy. We created meta tags for our website using ‘google tags’ and other services from google . @WAMedCommission WMC.wa.gov Survey Results: Where Do You Go for Information about Health Care Regulation?

  • TIP_Sheet_Expungement_Nursys_deletion_2017.pdf

    The NPDB does not recognize state expungements as a reason to void a NPDB record. NPDB Guidebook E-70 Process to remove an expunged action in Nursys while preserving the NPDB report 1. Edit the discipline case in Nursys  Add a Revision-to-Action code (1280—license restored or reinstated, complete)  Narrative - Disciplinary action is expunged by the state of XX and will no longer be publi- cally available at the state level 2. Verify that the Revision-to-Action was accepted by NPDB  One day after the Nursys entry, click on the NPDB reporting status to verify the action was accepted by NPDB  Accepted NPDB Revision-to-Action reports will show a new DCN number 3.

  • handout_2022DCM_mhead.pdf

    INSIGHTS FOR GOOD FACT-FINDING INSIGHT #1: Double-check the record to guard against finding facts that contain errors of perception and memory. INSIGHT #2: Our biases (including fast thinking) lead us unconsciously to make “snap judgments.” INSIGHT #3: Propositions, conclusions from propositions, and fact-findings are all conclusions from the evidence.

  • Formatted_NCSBN_ClinicalDecisionMaking_0814

    In what follows, I present a review of the emerging themes that have been explored in nursing clinical decision-making and highlight the known and suspected influencers on clinical decision-making. Nursing Clinical Decision-Making: A Literature Review William J. Muntean S W. J. Muntean | Clinical decision-making 2 II. LITERATURE REVIEW PROCESS An evaluation of the peer-reviewed literature generated from PsycINFO with various combinations of the terms “decision-making”, “judgment”, “clinical”, “novice”, and “nursing” was carried out. The following limits were placed on the search: (1) articles must come from peer-reviewed journals; (2) only English language publications were reviewed; and (3) full text of the article must be available.

  • Formatted_NCSBN_ClinicalDecisionMaking_0814

    In what follows, I present a review of the emerging themes that have been explored in nursing clinical decision-making and highlight the known and suspected influencers on clinical decision-making. Nursing Clinical Decision-Making: A Literature Review William J. Muntean S W. J. Muntean | Clinical decision-making 2 II. LITERATURE REVIEW PROCESS An evaluation of the peer-reviewed literature generated from PsycINFO with various combinations of the terms “decision-making”, “judgment”, “clinical”, “novice”, and “nursing” was carried out. The following limits were placed on the search: (1) articles must come from peer-reviewed journals; (2) only English language publications were reviewed; and (3) full text of the article must be available.