Search NCSBN

The search results displayed are from the entire site. Visit the Resources Section to focus your search and filter only resource items (publications, videos, papers, toolkits and other resources).

  • CJIS_Security_Policy_v5-9-4_20231220.pdf

    D-1 D.1 CJIS User Agreement .................................................................................................. D.1-1 D.2 Management Control Agreement ................................................................................. D.2-1 D.3 Noncriminal Justice Agency Agreement & Memorandum of Understanding .............

  • NCLEX_PN Test Plan Webinar_2017

    Considering unique cultural and spiritual client preferences, the applicable standard of care and legal instructions, the LPN/VN uses a clinical problem- solving process (the nursing process) to collect and organize relevant health care data, assist in the identification of the health needs/problems throughout the client’s life span and contribute to the interdisciplinary team in a variety of settings. 22 NCLEX® Integrated Processes • Nursing Process • Caring • Communication and Documentation • ...

  • MBPResponses

    Responses Jurisdictions Number of Boards Percentage of Boards Responding 1 year DC, NH 2 3% 2 years AK, AZ, GU, KS, LA-PN, MS, OK, OR 8 14% 3 years GA, IL, NM, SC, TN 5 8% 4 years LA-RN, TX 2 3% 5 years DE, UT, VT, WY 4 7% Unlimited AL, AR, AS, CA-RN, CA-VN, CNMI, CO, CT, FL, HI, IA, ID, IN, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MT, NC, ND, NE, NJ, NV, NY, OH, PA, RI, SD, VA, VI, WA, WI, WV-PN, WV-RN 37 63% APRN only Board of Nursing - Does not apply NE-APRN 1 2% Page 11 of 1172023 Licensure Survey NCLEX 4.1 Q8.

  • 2024am_gnielsen.pdf

    The publication and distribution of this presentation are not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Reproduction of this presentation is expressly prohibited. (502) 472-5367 @gregory_nielsen mailto:gregory@nielsenconsults.com mailto:gregory@nielsenconsults.com mailto:gregory@nielsenconsults.com Slide 1 Slide 2 Slide 3 Slide 4 Slide 5 Slide 6 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Slide 10 Slide 11 Slide 12 Slide 13 Slide 14 Slide 15 Slide 16 Slide 17 Slide 18 Slide 19 Slide 20 Slide 21 Slide 22 Slide 23 Slide 24 Slide 25 Slide 26 Slide 27 Slide 28 Slide 29 Slide 30 Slide 31 Slide 32 Slide 33 Slide 34 Slide 35 Slide 36 Slide 37 Slide 38 Slide 39

  • MBPResponses

    MBPResponses Discipline, Delegation, Telenursing MBP 2018 Kathleen Russell 3/8/2019 5:09:13 PM 58 Jurisdictions Included in the report: Table of Contents 1 . Terminology 2 . Agency Type 3 . Required Reporting to Law Enforcement 4 . Mandatory Reporting to Board of Nursing 5 . Board of Nursing Investigation/Discipline practices 6 . Subpoena Power 7 . Malpractice Payment Reports 8 . Evaluations during Investigation 9 .

  • MBPResponses

    MBPResponses 2024 Assistive Personnel Survey Generated: 4/8/2025 3:46:20 PM 59 Jurisdictions Included in the report: Table of Contents 1 . Terminology 2 . Agency Type 3 . Regulation of Assistive Personnel 4 . Reference to Delegation for Assistive Personnel in a Specific Statute/Regulation 5 . Approval of Assistive Personnel Training Programs 6 . Responsibility for Assistive Personnel Initial Competency Evaluation 7 .

  • PowerPoint Presentation

    Slide 17: Self-Care Problems Slide 18: Types of Assessments Slide 19: Areas of Concern in Each Case Type Slide 20: The Professional Executive Mindset Slide 21: How to Evaluate Fitness Slide 22: The Role of Fitness Evaluator Slide 23: The Assessment Process: Clinical vs. Forensic Roles Slide 24: The Assessment Process: Clinical vs. Forensic Roles Slide 25: Why We Need Fitness Evaluations Slide 26: Multiple Stakeholders: Can Licensee Conceive of Each One’s Perspective Slide 27: Fitness for Duty Considerations Slide 28: What are the Indications of Unfitness?

  • 2021SciSymp_lpoghosyan.pdf

    Page 22 Implications • Policymakers should take actions to remove unnecessary SOP restrictions to improve NP work environments, which may lead to better quality of care and patient outcomes Page 23 Limitations • Reliance on self-reported measures • Unable to link responses between 2012 and 2018 • No control group • Generalizability Page 24 Acknowledgements • My research team and research collaborators. • Funders: National Council of State Boards of Nursing [Grant number: R101016] Page 25 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Workforce, & National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. (2016, November).

  • MBPResponses

    For detailed information, please see the text responses below. Responses Jurisdictions Number of Boards Percentage of Boards Responding 1 year NH 1 2% 2 years AK, AZ, GU, KS, LA-PN, MS, OK, OR 8 14% 3 years DC, GA, IL, NM, SC, TN 6 10% 4 years LA-RN, TX 2 3% 5 years DE, UT, VT, WY 4 7% Unlimited AL, AR, AS, CA-RN, CA-VN, CNMI, CO, CT, FL, HI, IA, ID, IN, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MT, NC, ND, NE, NJ, NV, NY, OH, PA, RI, SD, VA, VI, WA, WI, WV-PN, WV-RN 36 62% APRN only Board of Nursing - Does not apply NE-APRN 1 2% Page 11 of 1172022 Licensure Survey NCLEX 4.1 Q8.

  • Financial Summary

    Additional costs to complete development and to transition to a remotely proctored exam have been estimated to total $19.8 million and would be expended over the next two years (FY-24/FY25). A total of $7 million of the $19.8 million has been expended in FY- 24. A total of $10 million was budgeted for FY-24 with the expectation that the balance of the spending on the project would be incurred in FY-25. No year-to-date spending on External Research Grants, NLC Grants to boards of nursing or Nursys Participation Grants.